Discussion:
Yet another egg in the face for the Evolutionists : Population Growth...
(too old to reply)
old man joe
2011-05-08 10:15:52 UTC
Permalink
here we have a segment of society who proudly boast of being born out of monkey's.

in order to support their claims they've concocted the idea that man evolved in Africa where there's
plenty of monkey remains. and not only this, but man finally evolved out of monkey's some
200,000 years ago.

since the population of the world at this time is estimated to be 6.8 billion people, anyone can see
from this link that world population is growing at an exponential rate... in just the last century
it nearly doubled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population

this being the case and not barring global plagues such as the Black Death, and mass killing's by
war, it is not reasonable to assume the Evolutionists have their ' facts ' in order. by their
system of Population Growth, which doesn't match up to the head count of even the last millennium,
by their method there would not even be standing room for the trillions of people that would be
alive today had man had 200,000 years to populate the planet.

earth resources to feed such a number certainly is beyond believability.

Evolution is beyond believability. in every aspect of it one must buy into the redefinition of
terms which the Atheists themselves developed in trying to understand the world they live in.
for example, the Periodic Table has no living elements in it yet all living things are comprised of
the elements of the Periodic Table.

we are required to redefine the source of life as coming from non-living things rather than the
Living God.

but even though the Evolutionists are Atheists, their own concoctions of Evolution are laughably
ignorant by their own science... a bag full of human remains should be alive just as the living
person holding the bag; after all, nothing they're comprised of is alive in either case by reason
of the elements in them.

so to cover themselves with more humor, they say life came out of the sea. the elements of the sea
are not alive. but this happened over long stretches of time they say... time isn't alive and
nothing alive could possibly give life to itself out of the molten, poison gaseous early earth they
like to promote. hey fella, sleep through Biology 101 ? there is nothing alive in absolute
sterility.

then we have another class of geniuses claiming life came from outer space. yeah, ok. none living
elements gave life to itself somewhere in outer space and just happened to come to earth and give
the non-living elements of the earth life.

with 200,000 years of time to populate the earth there would be over a trillion people, not
billions.
Chris
2011-05-08 13:10:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
here we have a segment of society who proudly boast of being born out of monkey's.
Out of monkey's what?
Post by old man joe
this being the case and not barring global plagues such as the Black
Death, and mass killing's by war, it is not reasonable to assume the
Evolutionists have their ' facts ' in order. by their system of
Population Growth, which doesn't match up to the head count of even the
last millennium, by their method there would not even be standing room
for the trillions of people that would be alive today had man had
200,000 years to populate the planet.
What exactly is your argument? I seriously don't understand it.

Do you want to say that population growth must always be the same and
cannot change?
Post by old man joe
earth resources to feed such a number certainly is beyond believability.
Evolution is beyond believability. in every aspect of it one must buy
into the redefinition of terms which the Atheists themselves developed
in trying to understand the world they live in. for example, the
Periodic Table has no living elements in it yet all living things are
comprised of the elements of the Periodic Table.
I don't understand why this makes evolution not believable. Have you just
discovered "emergence"?
Post by old man joe
we are required to redefine the source of life as coming from non-living
things rather than the Living God.
Please give a definition of life that requires that. And what does it
have to do with evolution? Are you sure you know the argument you want to
make?
Post by old man joe
a bag full of
human remains should be alive just as the living person holding the bag;
after all, nothing they're comprised of is alive in either case by
reason of the elements in them.
Please give a honest answer: Are you a troll?
If so, this spam isn't funny.
Post by old man joe
time isn't alive and nothing alive
could possibly give life to itself out of the molten, poison gaseous
early earth they like to promote. hey fella, sleep through Biology 101
? there is nothing alive in absolute sterility.
What does this have to do with "evolutionists" or population growth?

I have to assume you are just composing text blocks from creationist
websites together now.
Why?
Post by old man joe
with 200,000 years of time to populate the earth there would be over a
trillion people, not billions.
You still haven't given a valid reason why population growth couldn't
have been much slower in the past when there was not as good medicine or
infrastructure for producing and delivering food for example.
wf3h
2011-05-08 16:04:39 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 08 May 2011 06:15:52 -0400, old man joe
Post by old man joe
here we have a segment of society who proudly boast of being born out of monkey's.
in order to support their claims they've concocted the idea that man evolved in Africa where there's
plenty of monkey remains. and not only this, but man finally evolved out of monkey's some
200,000 years ago.
since the population of the world at this time is estimated to be 6.8 billion people, anyone can see
from this link that world population is growing at an exponential rate... in just the last century
it nearly doubled.
gee. because of science human life expectancy doubled

creationists, OTOH, had people drinking sewage for the last 2000
years.
Post by old man joe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
this being the case and not barring global plagues such as the Black Death, and mass killing's by
war, it is not reasonable to assume the Evolutionists have their ' facts ' in order. by their
system of Population Growth, which doesn't match up to the head count of even the last millennium,
by their method there would not even be standing room for the trillions of people that would be
alive today had man had 200,000 years to populate the planet.
uh no. see the above fact. creationists ensured the population didnt
increase because creationism kills people. so the population didnt
increase because creationists killed people
Post by old man joe
but even though the Evolutionists are Atheists, their own concoctions of Evolution are laughably
ignorant by their own science... a bag full of human remains should be alive just as the living
person holding the bag; after all, nothing they're comprised of is alive in either case by reason
of the elements in them.
he's never heard of 'metabolism' or the laws of chemistry

no surprise. creationists reject the existence of science. that's why
they have no explanation for ANY features of nature

creationism is a failure
raven1
2011-05-08 16:33:29 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 08 May 2011 06:15:52 -0400, old man joe
Post by old man joe
here we have a segment of society who proudly boast of being born out of monkey's.
I prefer the segment of society who know how to capitalize properly
and use apostrophes correctly.
Pepsi
2011-05-08 18:13:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
here we have a segment of society who proudly boast of being born out of monkey's.
here we have nothing more than an ignoramus who constantly, and proudly,
shows his ignorance.

Loading...