Why did early man not encounter a dinosaur since they co-existed ? ...

[old man joe]

the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12

since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.

in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.

interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45

there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.

( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )

the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.

the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation begins on the
second floor.

a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage. can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?

" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23

" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34

[Free Lunch]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <***@yahoo.com> wrote
in alt.talk.creationism:

Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?

You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage. can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34

[i***@gmail.com]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

[Dan Listermann]

"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:bdc48abc-d5fe-447f-88de-***@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <***@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
"Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you."

Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
future.

[Da'Splooge Whisperer]

Post by Dan Listermann
"Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you."
Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
future.

Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..

--
Never underestimate the power of an enema ... now if we can just talk the
Republicans into a couple hundred of them in Congress ;)

[Father Haskell]

Post by Da'Splooge Whisperer

"Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you."
Did that, got nothing regarding humans.  You will have to do better in the
future.

Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..

What? They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?

[Monthy Pyton]

Funkle Vic put fort wit...

Post by Da'Splooge Whisperer

"Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you."
Did that, got nothing regarding humans.  You will have to do better in the
future.

Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..

What? They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?

I was always a big fan of MPFC but could never make it through that movie for
some reason...I'll have to give it another go for nostagia's sake ...

I'm still waiting for the jesus loves dinosaurs too park to add some dancers
like the Rockettes to the singing Jesus And His Pet Dinosaurs Review, they'll
probably be called the Chrock-ette's ' ; )

--
OPEN a bible and *IT* will CLOSE your mind...

- AunÝie ChrisÝsÝain
- - Book Of Realizations©

[Father Haskell]

Post by Monthy Pyton

Funkle Vic put fort wit...

Post by Da'Splooge Whisperer

"Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you."
Did that, got nothing regarding humans.  You will have to do better in the
future.

Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..

What?  They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?

I was always a big fan of MPFC but could never make it through that movie for
some reason...I'll have to give it another go for nostagia's sake ...

Forget the comedy and wry philosophical commentary. The
music alone is worth the ticket.

Post by Monthy Pyton
I'm still waiting for the jesus loves dinosaurs too park to add some dancers
like the Rockettes to the singing Jesus And His Pet Dinosaurs Review, they'll
probably be called the Chrock-ette's ' ; )

[Free Lunch]

Post by i***@gmail.com

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

No, man did not exist with dinosaurs. The evidence about that is clear.
You may be thinking of a fraud in Texas perpetrated by some science
denying creationists.

[Pastor Kutchie]

Post by Free Lunch

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

No, man did not exist with dinosaurs. The evidence about that is clear.
You may be thinking of a fraud in Texas perpetrated by some science
denying creationists.

No, he's thinking of The Flintstones.

[Dave Fritzinger]

Post by Free Lunch

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

No, man did not exist with dinosaurs. The evidence about that is clear.
You may be thinking of a fraud in Texas perpetrated by some science
denying creationists.

Not only did man exist with dinosaurs, man still does exist with them.
I have one as a pet. He is a grey cockatiel. I also see dozens of
dinosaurs every day. In Hawaii, we have Mynahs, doves, various species
of cardinals, not to mention the native dinosaurs that the above are
displacing.

[Free Lunch]

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:38:03 -0800 (PST), Dave Fritzinger

Post by Dave Fritzinger

Post by Free Lunch

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

No, man did not exist with dinosaurs. The evidence about that is clear.
You may be thinking of a fraud in Texas perpetrated by some science
denying creationists.

Not only did man exist with dinosaurs, man still does exist with them.
I have one as a pet. He is a grey cockatiel. I also see dozens of
dinosaurs every day. In Hawaii, we have Mynahs, doves, various species
of cardinals, not to mention the native dinosaurs that the above are
displacing.

Those dinosaurs certainly. The ones that Richard Kiley spoke about when
John Hammond was throwing his little theme park together, not so much.

[Father Haskell]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

[Jimbo]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
hatted Gnomes. Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage. :D

[Christopher A. Lee]

Post by Jimbo

Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?- Hide quoted text -

They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
hatted Gnomes. Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage. :D

Actually they were under the bridge.

[Jimbo]

Post by Christopher A. Lee

Post by Jimbo

Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?- Hide quoted text -

They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
hatted Gnomes.   Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage.  :D

Actually they were under the bridge.

LOL! Yep, that's where a troll would be.

[Lorentz]

Post by Father Haskell
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.

[Father Haskell]

Post by Father Haskell
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

     The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.

Loading Image...
Loading Image...

[St. Jackanapes]

In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Father Haskell
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

     The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.

http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg

IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN*
2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
invaders!!!!

[Father Haskell]

Post by St. Jackanapes
In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Lorentz

Post by Father Haskell
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.

http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg

IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN*  
2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
invaders!!!!

So main course at Henry Fong's China Fun for the last supper
was rats.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by St. Jackanapes
In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Lorentz

Post by Father Haskell
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?

The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.

http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg

IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN*  
2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
invaders!!!!

So main course at Henry Fong's China Fun for the last supper
was rats.

Really big rats!

[raven1]

Post by i***@gmail.com
Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

You seem determined to maintain your status as the dumbest, most
ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?

[Lorentz]

Post by raven1

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

You seem determined to maintain your status as the dumbest, most
ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?

He has a highly competitive spirit.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Lorentz said...

Post by Lorentz

Post by raven1

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

You seem determined to maintain your status as the dumbest, most
ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?

He has a highly competitive spirit.

It has to be someone - at least he's proudly working to be dumber than
anyone else.

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?

I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.

Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

Other than the above, don't ask me to accept the unsupported claims of
various individuals who have an alternative agenda.

[Dan Listermann]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose
life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised
only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " (
Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements
comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the
Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the
Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his
family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives
the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of
which are still with
us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as
His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers
where God placed Adam
and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude
oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be
massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in
Africa as the Atheists
hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in
Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come
about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the
area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized
man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest
writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest
civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa
as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to
say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh,
if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from
non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation
begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God
hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.
can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The
Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll
default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may
ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For
the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

"Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?

I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.

Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

Other than the above, don't ask me to accept the unsupported claims of
various individuals who have an alternative agenda."

But you don't seem to understand "alternative agenda." Because it is
alternative, it must be far more correct that conventional, right?

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Dan Listermann

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all
come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose
life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised
only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a
character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " (
Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements
comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God
created all living
things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the
Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the
Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as
just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his
family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives
the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of
which are still with
us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as
His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers
where God placed Adam
and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude
oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be
massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in
Africa as the Atheists
hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in
Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come
about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the
area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized
man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest
writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest
civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa
as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to
say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh,
if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from
non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation
begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God
hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.
can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The
Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll
default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may
ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For
the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

"Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.
Other than the above, don't ask me to accept the unsupported claims of
various individuals who have an alternative agenda."
But you don't seem to understand "alternative agenda."  Because it is
alternative, it must be far more correct that conventional, right?

So are you a big endian or a little endian?

Choose your answer carefully ... :P

[Lorentz]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

[Father Haskell]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

    Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

How about a palelolithic cave with remains of a
cooking fire and a pile of dinosaur bones with
barbecue sauce?

[haiku jones]

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

    Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

How about a palelolithic cave with remains of a
cooking fire and a pile of dinosaur bones with
barbecue sauce?

Naw, the beast still could have been tens of
millions of years older than the cave men --
guys will eat ANYTHING.


Haiku Jones

[Ben Kaufman]

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:09:51 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

    Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

How about a palelolithic cave with remains of a
cooking fire and a pile of dinosaur bones with
barbecue sauce?

That could hinge on whether dinosaurs were kosher and that is questionable.
Supposedly, birds are the closet relative to them and some birds, like
chickens, are kosher while others such as raptors are not.

Ben

[Father Haskell]

On Jan 9, 8:31 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Ben Kaufman
That could hinge on whether dinosaurs were kosher and that is questionable.
Supposedly, birds are the closet relative to them  and some birds, like
chickens, are kosher while others such as raptors are not.

So that's why no kosher buzzard at my local butcher's.

They're really not that bad in soup, if you let it simmer
for a couple of days.

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

    Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Not exactly evidence as I wouldn't be around to be convinced
afterwards :P

[Ben Kaufman]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

    Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Not exactly evidence as I wouldn't be around to be convinced
afterwards :P

Just carry something indigestible in your pocket and we'll find it in the
dinoturd.

Ben

[Ben Kaufman]

Post by Lorentz

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex? <g>.

Ben

[SkyEyes]

On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

[Ben Kaufman]

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Cambrian mammal trilobites? Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that. Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.

Ben

[SkyEyes]

On Jan 11, 7:29 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Cambrian mammal trilobites?  Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that.  Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.  

Yup. He claimed that there were mammal fossils found in Cambrian
strata (which falsifies the ToE, natcherly). When asked *which*
mammal species were represented, Doofus answered "trilobites!"

Brenda

[Father Haskell]

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 11, 7:29 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Cambrian mammal trilobites?  Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that.  Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.  

Yup.  He claimed that there were mammal fossils found in Cambrian
strata (which falsifies the ToE, natcherly).  When asked *which*
mammal species were represented, Doofus answered "trilobites!"

He was probably thinking of tribbles.

[Prints Of Darkness]

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Thanks for the heads-up on a new froup to me ... torch a-lit ; )

Post by St. Jackanapes

Post by Father Haskell

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 11, 7:29 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at
all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to
suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are
comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a
character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,
 " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements
comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God
created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until
the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in
the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and
universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and
his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible
gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three
of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as
well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers
where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the
crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to
be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in
Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000
years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing
come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study
the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find
civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the
earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the
oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need
Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them
to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones...
huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes
from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their
foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God
hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib
cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of "
The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll
default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots?
then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is
good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Cambrian mammal trilobites?  Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that.  Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.  

Yup.  He claimed that there were mammal fossils found in Cambrian
strata (which falsifies the ToE, natcherly).  When asked *which*
mammal species were represented, Doofus answered "trilobites!"

He was probably thinking of tribbles.

Aren't we all when we masturbate pretending to be Big Jim Kirk??
<whacka-whacka-whacka--I need more personal lubricunt!!!--- MOM!>

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Prints Of Darkness said...

Post by Prints Of Darkness

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Thanks for the heads-up on a new froup to me ... torch a-lit ; )

You're velly welcum.

[Ben Kaufman]

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 11, 7:29 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Cambrian mammal trilobites?  Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that.  Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.  

Yup. He claimed that there were mammal fossils found in Cambrian
strata (which falsifies the ToE, natcherly). When asked *which*
mammal species were represented, Doofus answered "trilobites!"
Brenda

That's hilarious yet quite sad if this person is not just playing a jackass
troll.

Ben.

[haiku jones]

Post by SkyEyes
On Jan 9, 6:27 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.

   Or maybe if a T. Rex ran you down, caught you, and started ripping
you apart.

Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex?  <g>.

Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.

You're kidding? No? Wow...

Mammalian trilobites did not appear until
the late Triassic. I thought that everyone
knew that.


Haiku Jones

Post by SkyEyes
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

[Father Haskell]

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

[Father Haskell]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.

Sorry you can't, I sold those to the monks of EE!

[Father Haskell]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.

Sorry you can't, I sold those to the monks of EE!

No prob. There's still the rings of Uranus.

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.

Sorry you can't, I sold those to the monks of EE!

No prob.  There's still the rings of Uranus.

Sorry you can't have those either as I am rather attached to them :P

[Father Haskell]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.

I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.

Sorry you can't, I sold those to the monks of EE!

No prob.  There's still the rings of Uranus.

Sorry you can't have those either as I am rather attached to them :P

Cut you a deal on Jupiter's rings, then? Neptune's?

Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away? Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

[Darwin123]

Post by Father Haskell
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away?  Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

Our closest neighbor, Selene.

[Father Haskell]

Post by Father Haskell
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away?  Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

   Our closest neighbor, Selene.

I'd have made Selene one of Saturn's moons and
Titan ours.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...

Post by Darwin123

Post by Father Haskell
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away?  Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

Our closest neighbor, Selene.

Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
so ago.

[Father Haskell]

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...

Post by Father Haskell
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away?  Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

   Our closest neighbor, Selene.

Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
so ago.

Especially through binoculars.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...

Post by Father Haskell
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away?  Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?

   Our closest neighbor, Selene.

Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
so ago.

Especially through binoculars.

I love the moon - my parents managed to buy me a refractive
telescope when I was 11. It was only good for looking at the
moon, but what a fucking view! But it was out in front of the
house in a suburban city of a million people. Forget trying to
find even a star. Although I found a use when the older 13 year
old red haired girl across the street agreed to pose naked for
me while I trained my scope on her. It didn't work very well,
but I never told her that because she enjoyed it so much.

But when I was 4 years old my mother told me the secrets of the
Universe and I could never sleep at night after that - to this
day. She told me about how everything had it's place - the
Earth, along with all the other planets orbited around the Sun.

She explained that the sun orbited the around the center of
Milky Way galaxy. And that all of the millions of galaxies just
like the Milky Way were spinning around the center of the
Universe.

My insomnia started after that. I'd spend nights awake trying to
figure out what was outside the Universe. Luckily for me there
have been thousands of men & women a hell of a lot smarter than
I could ever be are working on this question day and night.

And thanks to TV & the Internet I get to read about it all the
time!

-St. Jackanapes
-------------------------------
Anti-Jesus Forum: http://www.voy.com/20630/

[Free Lunch]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:58:23 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell

Post by Father Haskell

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

What can I sell you?

Anything. Dave is clearly unable to think critically.

[[e-mail]]

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?


Quote the Raven1: "Seriously, I've been on Usenet for 13 years, and
you have to
be the dumbest, most ignorant person I've run across in that time"

[Budikka666]

Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.

Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.

Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.

Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.

Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.

Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.

Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary

Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.

Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.

Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.

Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave

Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.

Case closed. End of story. End of You.

Budikka

[Word Smyth]

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension


You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

[haiku jones]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.

Perhaps you felt cramped for space? Yes? Here,
take all you need. Use the back of this post if
necessary:








































Haiku Jones

[Word Smyth]

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

[archie dux]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow. That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.

archie

[Word Smyth]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow.  That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie

Perhaps you should read what was written. There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.

[Masked Avenger]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by archie dux

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space? Yes? Here,
take all you need. Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow. That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie

Perhaps you should read what was written. There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.

Alright then ....... let's make it a little easier for you ...... just
answer #2 for the time being ....... you did say it was 'easy' .......
...... unless of course you are just blowing hot air ...........

[haiku jones]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow.  That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie

Perhaps you should read what was written.

I did.

You can't.

You've fooled no one.

You lose.

Bye bye.


Haiku Jones

Post by Word Smyth
There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.

[Wombat]

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow.  That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie

Perhaps you should read what was written. There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.

Then why did you bother to post in the first place, wasting your oh so
valuable time.

Wombat

[Wombat]

Post by Wombat

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Word Smyth

Post by haiku jones

Post by Word Smyth

Post by Budikka666
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.  Not Bible
quotes.  Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation.  Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'.  Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator.  Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul.  Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.  This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds  That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed.  End of story.  End of You.
Budikka

Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.

...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space?  Yes?  Here,
take all you need.  Use the back of this post if
Haiku Jones

Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)

Wow.  That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie

Perhaps you should read what was written. There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.

Then why did you bother to post in the first place, wasting your oh so
valuable time.
Wombat

I really should check the dates of posts before replying. I missed
this thread when it came out.

Wombat

[Father Haskell]

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

[Ken]

Post by Father Haskell

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave

[Father Haskell]

Post by Ken

Post by Father Haskell

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave

That was the one that had its brains up its ass?

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Ken

Post by Father Haskell

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave

That was the one that had its brains up its ass?

What brains?

[Father Haskell]

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Ken

Post by Father Haskell

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave

That was the one that had its brains up its ass?

What brains?

The brains that marginally separated it from a plant.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Ken

Post by Father Haskell

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?

The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.

According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave

That was the one that had its brains up its ass?

What brains?

The brains that marginally separated it from a plant.

Oh, the poop plant...

[Darwin123]

Post by ***@gmail.com

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.

Watch your mouth.
Some Creationist will claim that the Dinosaurs were the Son's of
Heaven that mated with the daughters of the Earth in Genesis. And when
this gets into a biology textbook as a "scientific theory," we will
all blame you.
Why you? Because Creationists are not smart enough to be legally
tried.

[Devils Advocaat]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.

Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.

[Peter]

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose
life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised
only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " (
Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements
comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the
Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the
Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his
family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives
the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of
which are still with
us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as
His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers
where God placed Adam
and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude
oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be
massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in
Africa as the Atheists
hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in
Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come
about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the
area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized
man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest
writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest
civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa
as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to
say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh,
if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from
non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation
begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God
hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.
can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The
Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll
default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may
ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For
the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.

Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.

"interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his
family weren't life

Post by Free Lunch

Post by old man joe
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question"

too busy indulging in incest?

[Father Haskell]

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.
Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.

He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.

[St. Jackanapes]

Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.
Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.

He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.

Yes he was! What he was referring to was Flintstone Village at 3400
Cahuenga Blvd. in West Hollywood, California. Cartooning archaeologists
have spent many years excavating through the amazing historical records
that humans and dinosaurs left during the Hanna-Barbara period.

I'm constantly amazed that I don't see more Creationists citing the
extensive archaeological contributions that have been made from the
years of work by the Hanna-Barbara teams. It makes no sense! Where are
the Ivy League schools following up on Hanna-Barbara's early work?

[Father Haskell]

Post by St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...

Post by Father Haskell

Post by Devils Advocaat

Post by Free Lunch
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.

Post by old man joe
the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
reality concerning anything of which they speak.  after all, to suppose life comes from
things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
2 Pet. 2:12
since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life,  " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
exist alive without Him.
in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
things.  dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
some 6 thousand years.  the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
thousand years.
interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
threatened by carnivore dinosaur's.  a fair question.  the Bible gives the location of the
Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
us today.  we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
Mt. 5:45
there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
and civilization began.  the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
hope.  their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
space of time he never built a city there.  neither did writing come about in his 2
hundred thousand years of existence in Africa.  but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
and writing things down on clay.
the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along.  the earliest writings on clay are
dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa.  the Atheists need Africa as their starting
point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
note that they must, of necessity, steer around that.  their foundation begins on the
second floor.
a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage.  can be suppose for
a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
he's accustomed to ?  
" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
that are accustomed to do evil. "  Jer. 13:23
" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
out of that which fills the heart. "  Mt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs.  Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ?   Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.

Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.
Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.

He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.

Yes he was! What he was referring to was Flintstone Village at 3400
Cahuenga Blvd. in West Hollywood, California. Cartooning archaeologists
have spent many years excavating through the amazing historical records
that humans and dinosaurs left during the Hanna-Barbara period.

Mr. Slate's gravel quarry, wasn't it? Identified POSITIVELY
by the huge amount of paleolithic Winston butts.

Post by St. Jackanapes
I'm constantly amazed that I don't see more Creationists citing the
extensive archaeological contributions that have been made from the
years of work by the Hanna-Barbara teams. It makes no sense! Where are
the Ivy League schools following up on Hanna-Barbara's early work?

With research tools like the massive Flinstones archive
on YouTube, who the fuck needs those 4-eyed eggheads?