Discussion:
Natural Selection ? huh, Darwin naturally selected his first cousin as his wife... incest was natural for him...
(too old to reply)
old man joe
2009-04-06 20:03:08 UTC
Permalink
no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin. the character of the man defines
his philosophy.

primates have no laws... let alone laws about incest. following the course of the
primate he so desperately wanted to be superior to, Darwin naturally had no use for
human law and order and went the way of the jungle instead. this is who the
Evolutionists worship as the god of their philosophy... sounds like a remake of the
movie Planet of the Apes.

pointing and grunting his way into an idea of which the gullible require no proof
( except for cartoons ) the sons of Darwin indeed follow wherever his man made facts
take them... such Evolutionary ideas as turkeys becoming dinosaurs then becoming
turkeys again is common in the fantasy world of Evolution.

while the bones have not and never will be found of the turkey which they claim
evolved into a dinosaur, it is evident to anyone without prejudice that God made all
creatures " after their own kind " just as He says, and all things including man in
six literal days. while Darwin and his sons like to think themselves as hybrid
monkeys, that's fine... be all you can be... ( even God calls them ' unreasoning
animals ' 2 Pet. 2:12 )

the intrinsic nature of the Evolutionist illustrates his less than factual world...
for example... since they gullibly swallow Evolution hook, line and sinker without
proof, these also believe in UFO's, Atlantis, ghosts, re-incarnation, crop circles,
meteors killing off the dinosaur's but not the delicate frogs which live in the same
area... anything that doesn't require a rational thought is fine with the
Evolutionist.

********************************************************

" Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved..."

( Acts 16:31a NASB )
Ken
2009-04-06 20:51:01 UTC
Permalink
And a Senile Old Troll is He
TimK
2009-04-06 21:38:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin. the character of the man defines
his philosophy.
Marrying one's cousin isn't incest you half-witted piece of shit.
Thurisaz the Einherjer
2009-04-07 07:15:47 UTC
Permalink
Summary: "Yes I'm still an ignorant moron"

We know already.
--
Romans 2:24 revised:
"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you
cretinists, as it is written on aig."

My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
Lee
2009-04-07 07:37:17 UTC
Permalink
"old man joe" <***@lone.com> rambled on in a senile manner at news:***@4ax.com...
Jesus says: Loading Image...
Reverend Dave
2009-04-07 13:16:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin. the character of
the man defines his philosophy.
As I pointed out before

- cousin marriage was an accepted practice in Darwin's time

- Darwin married his cousin before Mendel published his work on genetics

And as you say, "the character of a man defines his philosphy"

Jacob married his first cousins Rachel and Leah. Between them he sired
eight inbred sons, plus four more bastard sons by their handmaids. Since
Jacob is considered the father of Israel, that means that Moses, and
everyone who came after, including Jesus, are the progeny of incest.

It would further follow that if, as you claim, anyone who marries their
cousin is a reprobrate and therefore anyone who follows the philosophy of
such a reprobate is also a reprobate, what does that by extension make
you?
Post by old man joe
primates have no laws... let alone laws about incest. following the course of the
primate he so desperately wanted to be superior to, Darwin naturally
had no use for human law and order and went the way of the jungle
instead. this is who the Evolutionists worship as the god of their
philosophy... sounds like a remake of the movie Planet of the Apes.
pointing and grunting his way into an idea of which the gullible require no proof
( except for cartoons ) the sons of Darwin indeed follow wherever his
man made facts take them... such Evolutionary ideas as turkeys
becoming dinosaurs then becoming turkeys again is common in the
fantasy world of Evolution.
You and I both know that birds didn't evolve back into dinosaurs. Did you
add that to make it obvious that you don't have a clue what you're
talking about?
Post by old man joe
while the bones have not and never will be found of the turkey which they claim
evolved into a dinosaur, it is evident to anyone without prejudice
that God made all creatures " after their own kind " just as He says,
and all things including man in six literal days. while Darwin and
his sons like to think themselves as hybrid monkeys, that's fine... be
all you can be... ( even God calls them ' unreasoning animals ' 2
Pet. 2:12 )
the intrinsic nature of the Evolutionist illustrates his less than factual world...
for example... since they gullibly swallow Evolution hook, line and
sinker without proof, these also believe in UFO's, Atlantis, ghosts,
re-incarnation, crop circles, meteors killing off the dinosaur's but
not the delicate frogs which live in the same area... anything that
doesn't require a rational thought is fine with the Evolutionist.
Funny, I was thinking it was the Cretinists that didn't show any signs of
rational thought. Matter of fact, I suspect you might be the poster boy.
--
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is
those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert
that this or that problem will never be solved by science. - Charles
Darwin
Preston
2009-04-07 17:46:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin. the character of the man defines
his philosophy.
primates have no laws... let alone laws about incest. following the course of the
primate he so desperately wanted to be superior to, Darwin naturally had no use for
human law and order and went the way of the jungle instead. this is who the
Evolutionists worship as the god of their philosophy... sounds like a remake of the
movie Planet of the Apes.
Question--who did Adam and Eve's children have sex with to make the
third generation?
Darwin123
2009-04-07 23:38:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Preston
Question--who did Adam and Eve's children have sex with to make the
third generation?
Angels. The sons of Adam obviously mated with female angels. Where
else would Cain get a wife. In fact, where else would ANY of Adams
sons get a wife. Daughters of Adam and Eve aren't mentioned.
It get hairy later. Later, the female humans mated with male
angels. Obviously, misogeny with female angels isn't as bad as
misogenty with male angels. That is part of the reason that God sent
the Great Flood. "And the sons of heaven knew the the daughters of the
earth, ..."
Of course, it is curious. God told humans to "be fruitful and
multiply," left human beings no option but to mate with angels, and
then punished humans for it. Curious but typical.
Father Haskell
2009-04-27 19:29:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Preston
Question--who did Adam and Eve's children have sex with to make the
third generation?
    Angels. The sons of Adam obviously mated with female angels.
I'll bet they were Korean.
Where
else would Cain get a wife. In fact, where else would ANY of Adams
sons get a wife. Daughters of Adam and Eve aren't mentioned.
     It get hairy later. Later, the female humans mated with male
angels. Obviously, misogeny with female angels isn't as bad as
misogenty with male angels. That is part of the reason that God sent
the Great Flood. "And the sons of heaven knew the the daughters of the
earth, ..."
     Of course, it is curious. God told humans to "be fruitful and
multiply," left human beings no option but to mate with angels, and
then punished humans for it. Curious but typical.
St. Jack
2009-05-08 01:23:04 UTC
Permalink
In alt.flame.jesus.christ Father Haskell vomited out...
Post by Father Haskell
Post by Preston
Question--who did Adam and Eve's children have sex with to make the
third generation?
    Angels. The sons of Adam obviously mated with female angels.
I'll bet they were Korean.
The Korean I screwed was an angel. Well, she was until the next moring
when she told me that we were getting married and driving to Detroit so
she could get her 4 year old son back from her ex-husband.
--
St. Jackanapes
- http://www.voy.com/20630/
---------------------------------------
Doc Chung's Cat Suey Café...
- http://www.jackanapes.ws/2pdcat.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- "If poor children wish to gain any help from the GOP,
~ they had best crawl back in the womb." - Jesus
Androcles 2
2009-04-27 03:47:02 UTC
Permalink
In alt.flame.jesus.christ Preston vomited out...
Post by Preston
Post by old man joe
no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin. the character of the man defines
his philosophy.
primates have no laws... let alone laws about incest. following the course of the
primate he so desperately wanted to be superior to, Darwin naturally had no use for
human law and order and went the way of the jungle instead. this is who the
Evolutionists worship as the god of their philosophy... sounds like a remake of the
movie Planet of the Apes.
Question--who did Adam and Eve's children have sex with to make the
third generation?
Spider Monkeys?
--
St. Jackanapes
- http://www.voy.com/20630/
---------------------------------------
Doc Chung's Cat Suey Café...
- http://www.jackanapes.ws/2pdcat.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- "If poor children wish to gain any help from the GOP,
~ they had best crawl back in the womb." - Jesus
Father Haskell
2009-04-07 19:37:33 UTC
Permalink
  no wonder as to the why's and wherefor's of ' Natural Selection, '
coming from an incestuous reprobate such as Darwin.  the character of the man defines
his philosophy.
Gen 9:20 - 27
Loading...