oH mY. --->> Whats THIS! <<--->> EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION <<

[AllSeeing-I]

Can it be? Say it isn't so!

Can Adman be WRONG?

Is THIS evidence of divergence?

Let's see!

-----------------------

Your inner fish eXposed:


"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"

"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "

http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------

OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?

How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?

Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !

uh oh.

Wait a minuet here.


well...Well....WELL.....

Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]

Aww shucks.

The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.

It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.

He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.


So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.

It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth


It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.

There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.

This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!


--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...


The All Seeing I

[Conan the bacterium]

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may: who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?

Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?

OK, so that's actually three questions.


Conan

[Mark Evans]

On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"

Mark Evans

[Uncle Vic]

Post by Mark Evans
On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first
finding of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between
fins and limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the
finding in a paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007
issue of Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its
fins led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to
progress to the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then
latter into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for
years depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting
evolutionist drooled over it and made up a wild story about it
being a transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat
looking at finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at
home lonely with the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being
---just another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy
tale comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

[AllSeeing-I]

Post by Mark Evans
On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first
finding of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between
fins and limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the
finding in a paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007
issue of Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its
fins led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to
progress to the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then
latter into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for
years depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting
evolutionist drooled over it and made up a wild story about it
being a transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat
looking at finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at
home lonely with the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being
---just another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy
tale comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A:  It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we
see rainbows in the sky today.  This is proof of the divinity of Jesus
Christ and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

[Uncle Vic]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere

Any questions?

[Prophet]

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we see
rainbows in the sky today.  This is proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ
and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein

Yeah.

Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

[Uncle Vic]

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER
THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists? Post it, don't just
claim there is some.

You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence. None.
You would be the first. Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

[AllSeeing-I]

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER
THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists?  Post it, don't just
claim there is some.
You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence.  None.  
You would be the first.  Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

Oh pullleze.

Supernatural evidences are abound.

[Uncle Vic]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers
allow hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT
ANSWER THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural
like you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists?  Post it, don't just
claim there is some.
You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence.  None.

 

You would be the first.  Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.

You just claimed there is some. Post your evidence so we can evaluate
it. Or are you afraid to?

[Father Haskell]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER
THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists?  Post it, don't just
claim there is some.
You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence.  None.  
You would be the first.  Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Then so should be proofs.

[Masked Avenger]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER
THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists? Post it, don't just
claim there is some.
You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence. None.
You would be the first. Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.

well then produce some !!!! you fucking moron ......

I have never seen any evidence for anything supernatural ..... if there
is any .... as you say ..... what is it ??

[George]

Post by AllSeeing-I
Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.

Where ?
And why is it that they never reach the dizzy heights of proving
themselves to other than believers

[Uncle Vic]

Post by George

Post by AllSeeing-I
Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.

Where ?
And why is it that they never reach the dizzy heights of proving
themselves to other than believers

I guess it falls under that old category - you gotta be a believer in order
to believe.

[Yap]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER
THE SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Got any evidence anything supernatural exists?  Post it, don't just
claim there is some.
You guys haven't supplied us with any "supernatural" evidence.  None.  
You would be the first.  Imagine how popular you'd be if you could
actually supply some.

Oh pullleze.
Supernatural evidences are abound.

Oh ya?
Like what?

[Yap]

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we see
rainbows in the sky today.  This is proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ
and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

Now I can accept supernatural evidence....please provide.

[Pink Freud]

Post by Prophet

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow
hin to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A: It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

EVOLUTION: Evidence everywhere
CREATION: Evidence nowhere
Any questions?
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we see
rainbows in the sky today. This is proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ
and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein

Yeah.
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

There's no such thing as the supernatural, so it's really a moot point.

I don't just mean that in the way of saying "there are no such things as
ghosts", I mean that 'supernatural' is a null word. It's useful in
discussing works of fiction, in the same way the word 'Jedi' is.

If ghosts did exist, they wouldn't be supernatural, they'd be natural.

[Pope Rudraigh]

On Fri, 21 May 2010 10:09:26 +0100, "Pink Freud" <***@here.com>
wrote:

<snip>

Post by Pink Freud

Post by Prophet
Why won't you accept supernatural evidence for the supernatural like
you accept natural evidence for the natural?

There's no such thing as the supernatural, so it's really a moot point.
I don't just mean that in the way of saying "there are no such things as
ghosts", I mean that 'supernatural' is a null word. It's useful in
discussing works of fiction, in the same way the word 'Jedi' is.
If ghosts did exist, they wouldn't be supernatural, they'd be natural.

Well put. I might argue with your use of "moot point" but, other than
that, well put.

Pope Rudraigh
"I'm the guy your mother warned you about."

[Syd M.]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first
finding of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between
fins and limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the
finding in a paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007
issue of Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its
fins led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to
progress to the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then
latter into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for
years depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting
evolutionist drooled over it and made up a wild story about it
being a transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat
looking at finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at
home lonely with the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being
---just another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy
tale comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A:  It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we
see rainbows in the sky today.  This is proof of the divinity of Jesus
Christ and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

But you have nothing. Evolution will not go away just because Assman
doesn't like it or understand it.

PDW

[haiku jones]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by Mark Evans
On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first
finding of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between
fins and limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the
finding in a paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007
issue of Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its
fins led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to
progress to the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then
latter into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for
years depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting
evolutionist drooled over it and made up a wild story about it
being a transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat
looking at finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at
home lonely with the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being
---just another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy
tale comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans

A:  It keeps him out of their hair for a few hours.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"The Bible talks about the first rainbow after the Great Flood, and we
see rainbows in the sky today.  This is proof of the divinity of Jesus
Christ and the existence of God." - Zacharias Mulletstein- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

CAN YOU POSSIBLY TYPE LOUDER? I'M HAVING TROUBLE
HEARING YOU.

AS FOR "ANSWERING THE SUBJECT" THAT WAS WELL
AND FULLY DONE WHEN SOMEONE POINTED OUT THAT
"TRANSITIONAL SPECIES [CAN} ALSO CONTINUE
ON AS VIABLE SPECIES IN THEIR OWN RIGHT"

DO YOU NEED FURTHER HELP IN UNDERSTANDING THIS?


HAIKU JONES

[Ken]

Post by AllSeeing-I
TRANSLATION: I KNOW EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT. SO WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER THE
SUBJECT I WILL ATTACK THE POSTER INSTEAD

CAN YOU POSSIBLY TYPE LOUDER?  I'M HAVING TROUBLE
HEARING YOU.
AS FOR "ANSWERING THE SUBJECT" THAT WAS WELL
AND FULLY DONE WHEN SOMEONE POINTED OUT THAT
"TRANSITIONAL SPECIES [CAN} ALSO CONTINUE
ON AS VIABLE SPECIES IN THEIR OWN RIGHT"
DO YOU NEED FURTHER HELP IN UNDERSTANDING THIS?
HAIKU JONES

ASSman---->Way beyond any possible help

[Uncle Vic]

Post by Ken
ASSman---->Way beyond any possible help

...and he likes it that way.

[Ken]

Post by Mark Evans
No, 4 questions with the 4th one being "Why do his keepers allow hin
to drool over a computer?"
Mark Evans-

Keeps ASSman busy so he won't masturbate in the ward's day room

[Sla#s]

Post by Conan the bacterium
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?

I still can't work out how anyone can be that stupid!
It is like saying; "if a herbivore evolves into a carnivore how come there
are still herbivores"!

They must physically switch off some part of their brain!

Slatts

[Ken]

Post by Sla#s

Post by Conan the bacterium
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?

I still can't work out how anyone can be that stupid!
It is like saying; "if a herbivore evolves into a carnivore how come there
are still herbivores"!
They must physically switch off some part of their brain!
Slatts

A couple of nights ago on one of the PBS stations there was a series
about dogs and their relationship with people. One of their
explainations of how dogs changed so fast (15K years) from wolves
inolved a relationship between two brain chemicals that altered their
physiology

NATURE’s two-part special Dogs That Changed the World tells the epic
story of the wolf’s evolution, how “man’s best friend” changed human
society and how we in turn have radically transformed dogs.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/dogs-that-changed-the-world/introduction/1273/

[Ken]

On May 8, 1:03 pm, Ken <***@aol.com> wrote:
One of their

explainations of how dogs changed so fast (15K years)  from wolves
inolved a relationship between two brain chemicals that altered their
physiology

Was a bit off in describing thyroxine and adrenaline as "brain
chemicals"
Lower levels of thyroxine produced smaller animals with less
agression, more tameabilty, and produced physical changes (dogs) over
time

For an abstract on this check out page 6 (and beyond) of
http://homepage.mac.com/eckersley/predomesticateddog/canislupusfamiliaris.pdf
provided one has enuf intelligence to understand (which effectively
leaves out all fundies and creatioNUTS)

[Father Haskell]

On May 7, 9:41 pm, Conan the bacterium

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I

A question, if I may:  who, exactly, is this loon,
and whatever mislead him into thinking that
transitional species can't also continue on as
vaiable species in their own right?
Or is he of the "if dogs came from wolves,
how come there are still wolves?" school
of buffoonery?
OK, so that's actually three questions.
Conan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

If christians came from jews, why are there still jews?

[raven1]

On Fri, 7 May 2010 18:15:22 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can Adman be WRONG?

Always. And how did you get out of my killfile?

<re-plonk>

[AllSeeing-I]

Post by raven1
On Fri, 7 May 2010 18:15:22 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can Adman be WRONG?

Always. And how did you get out of my killfile?
<re-plonk>

Run Forrest! Run

Forrest Gump! Run!

[Syd M.]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by raven1
On Fri, 7 May 2010 18:15:22 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can Adman be WRONG?

Always. And how did you get out of my killfile?
<re-plonk>

Run Forrest! Run
Forrest Gump! Run!

I wouldn't be declaring victory just yet, Assman.
See, your still completely wrong.

PDW

[Free Lunch]

Post by raven1
On Fri, 7 May 2010 18:15:22 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can Adman be WRONG?

Always. And how did you get out of my killfile?
<re-plonk>

He seems to be having trouble spelling his name the same.

[MarkA]

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
argument. How original. If Americans descended from Europeans, how can
there still be Europeans?

It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today. I guess he'll
be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.

[AllSeeing-I]

Post by MarkA

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
argument.  How original.  If Americans descended from Europeans, how can
there still be Europeans?
It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today.  I guess he'll
be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.
--
MarkA
Keeper of the Butter Dish of Balshazar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Naww. You don't get to have it both ways.

This fish started diverging and then stopped? BUT some of them
continued to diverge? We have not observed anything like that taking
place on this planet.

The fish alive today with only SOME of the features necessarty to
diverge into a terrestrial species DID NOT NEED THOSE ATTRIBUTES for
their survival.

Which means natural selection as described is bullshit.

[Uncle Vic]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by MarkA

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
argument.  How original.  If Americans descended from Europeans, how can
there still be Europeans?
It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today.  I guess he'll
be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.
--
MarkA
Keeper of the Butter Dish of Balshazar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Naww. You don't get to have it both ways.
This fish started diverging and then stopped? BUT some of them
continued to diverge? We have not observed anything like that taking
place on this planet.
The fish alive today with only SOME of the features necessarty to
diverge into a terrestrial species DID NOT NEED THOSE ATTRIBUTES for
their survival.
Which means natural selection as described is bullshit.

You're spinning your wheels. You're desperate to make evolution go
away. But new evidence for it is found every day. Asking evolution
to go away is like asking gravity to go away. Or asking the sun to
stop in the sky.

--
Uncle Vic
AA#2011

[MarkA]

Post by Uncle Vic

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by MarkA

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first
finding of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between
fins and limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the
finding in a paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007
issue of Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its
fins led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to
progress to the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then
latter into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for
years depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting
evolutionist drooled over it and made up a wild story about it
being a transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat
looking at finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at
home lonely with the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being
---just another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy
tale comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still
monkeys?" argument.  How original.  If Americans descended from
Europeans, how can there still be Europeans?
It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today.  I guess
he'll be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.
--
MarkA
Keeper of the Butter Dish of Balshazar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Naww. You don't get to have it both ways.
This fish started diverging and then stopped? BUT some of them
continued to diverge? We have not observed anything like that taking
place on this planet.
The fish alive today with only SOME of the features necessarty to
diverge into a terrestrial species DID NOT NEED THOSE ATTRIBUTES for
their survival.
Which means natural selection as described is bullshit.

It's obvious that the depth of your understanding of evolution is
sufficient to overrule the rest of the scientific community. Where do we
send your Nobel Prize?

Post by Uncle Vic
You're spinning your wheels. You're desperate to make evolution go
away. But new evidence for it is found every day. Asking evolution to
go away is like asking gravity to go away. Or asking the sun to stop in
the sky.

Don't start on that whole Joshua thing!

[Joe Bruno]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by MarkA

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
argument.  How original.  If Americans descended from Europeans, how can
there still be Europeans?
It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today.  I guess he'll
be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.
--
MarkA
Keeper of the Butter Dish of Balshazar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Naww. You don't get to have it both ways.
This fish started diverging and then stopped?

No. One fish diverged by mutation and from it, a new species developed
that lived on land.
The other fish did not mutate and are still fish.

[Pink Freud]

Post by AllSeeing-I

Post by MarkA

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!

The old, "if humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
argument. How original. If Americans descended from Europeans, how can
there still be Europeans?
It would seem that a fish with arm and leg bones in its fins is not
significant if it had any descendants that are alive today. I guess he'll
be out fishing for living Tiktaaliks next.
--
MarkA
Keeper of the Butter Dish of Balshazar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Naww. You don't get to have it both ways.
This fish started diverging and then stopped?

Why not? If conditions are different to where other fishes are located?

Post by AllSeeing-I
BUT some of them
continued to diverge?

Why not?

Post by AllSeeing-I
We have not observed anything like that taking
place on this planet.

You haven't a fucking clue. You aren't a scientist. You have very little
knowledge of biology, or scientific studies. All you are doing is pissing in
the wind.

Post by AllSeeing-I
The fish alive today with only SOME of the features necessarty to
diverge into a terrestrial species DID NOT NEED THOSE ATTRIBUTES for
their survival.

I love it when ASI tries to speak like a scientist.
So cute, like a little kid trying to play 'kitchen' or something.

Post by AllSeeing-I
Which means natural selection as described is bullshit.

You really are a misguided fool.

[Jimbo]

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!
Can Adman be WRONG?
Is THIS evidence of divergence?
Let's see!
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists

Perhaps your problem is your own hubris and conceit. These findings
are presented to all, not just idiotic religionists.

[SkyEyes]

Post by AllSeeing-I
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...

Were any of your grandparents still alive when you were born?

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

[Yap]

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can it be? Say it isn't so!

Any thing can be, but a god cannot be.

Post by AllSeeing-I
Can Adman be WRONG?

Oh, (ad)man may not be wrong, but a (mad)man certainly is wrong.

Post by AllSeeing-I
Is THIS evidence of divergence?

We do have divergence, but not on believing the human imagination
embraced by pagans or ancient myths.

Post by AllSeeing-I
Let's see!

You have never seen any, no body is surprised at you not seeing
anything truth.

Post by AllSeeing-I
-----------------------
"Coelacanth fossil sheds light on fin-to-limb evolution"
"A 400 million-year-old fossil of a coelacanth fin, the first finding
of its kind, fills a shrinking evolutionary gap between fins and
limbs. University of Chicago scientists describe the finding in a
paper highlighted on the cover of the July/August 2007 issue of
Evolution & Development. "
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070801.coelacanth.shtml
--------------------------
OK. The Coelacanth fossil is an example of divergence showing a
transitional species from water to land. Right? The bones in its fins
led to the coelacanth being depicted as a fish about to progress to
the walking stage. Looks good, eh?
How many times has THIS example, (and so many others like it) been
brought up to creationists as evidence of a population of fish
eventually becoming a population of terrestrial species ---then latter
into humans?
Too many? Not enough? How could I have missed this evidence? !
uh oh.
Wait a minuet here.
well...Well....WELL.....
Lookie at what we have HERE. [face palm] [sigh]
Aww shucks.
The coelacanth still lives in deep sea waters today, but was for years
depicted as an intermediate form.
It turns out this was NOT a transitional but just another dead fish
buried during the flood --- then-- some poor unsuspecting evolutionist
drooled over it and made up a wild story about it being a
transitional. Not unlike the way poor old Darwin sat looking at
finches and apes while his pretty cousin-wife sat at home lonely with
the kids.
He was too busy making up his wild and exotic fairy tales about men
descending from apes or finches not really being finches any more.
So There Ya Have It folks in lurk land.
It seems the Coelacanth is alive and well today, happy being ---just
another fish.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
It seems Adman was NOT wrong after all.
There is NO evidence for divergence --never was --Never will be.
This fish stoey is just another example of a transitional fairy tale
comming from those zany and crazy evolutioNUTS!
--
Your "Inner fish" is just another outer scam says...
The All Seeing I