Discussion:
The hostile environment of ' early earth ' described by the Evolutionists could never have brought forth life of itself...
(too old to reply)
old man joe
2009-12-24 20:59:11 UTC
Permalink
huh. the picture painted by the Evolutionists of what they call ' early earth ' is one in
which no life could possibly exist, let alone produce life in and of itself.

the way they describe the first ' billion ' years of the existence of earth... starting
off as a thoroughly cooked mass of poison gas and liquid elements roasting itself in the
vacuum of space is supposed to be the intelligent thinking of allegedly educated men and
women.

such is about as believable as my Thanksgiving turkey evolving from a dinosaur and then
back into my Thanksgiving turkey. yet, this is their folly.

here's a link which try's to answer the question " what was early earth like ? "

http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html

it try's to answer the question but fails miserably as with all Evolutionists trying to
make facts out of fiction. burning elements roasting in poison gas makes no life from
elements that are not alive to begin with. their contrary view to their own inventions of
' facts ' just go to show that they are brainwashed by their own devices which desperately
hope there is no God to answer to.

dream on, boys.
bob young
2009-12-26 03:50:02 UTC
Permalink
******
Post by old man joe
huh. the picture painted by the Evolutionists of what they call ' early earth ' is one in
which no life could possibly exist, let alone produce life in and of itself.
the way they describe the first ' billion ' years of the existence of earth... starting
off as a thoroughly cooked mass of poison gas and liquid elements roasting itself in the
vacuum of space is supposed to be the intelligent thinking of allegedly educated men and
women.
such is about as believable as my Thanksgiving turkey evolving from a dinosaur and then
back into my Thanksgiving turkey. yet, this is their folly.
here's a link which try's to answer the question " what was early earth like ? "
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
it try's to answer the question but fails miserably as with all Evolutionists trying to
make facts out of fiction. burning elements roasting in poison gas makes no life from
elements that are not alive to begin with. their contrary view to their own inventions of
' facts ' just go to show that they are brainwashed by their own devices which desperately
hope there is no God to answer to.
dream on, boys.
bob young
2009-12-26 03:55:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
huh. the picture painted by the Evolutionists of what they call ' early earth ' is one in
which no life could possibly exist, let alone produce life in and of itself.
the way they describe the first ' billion ' years of the existence of earth... starting
off as a thoroughly cooked mass of poison gas and liquid elements roasting itself in the
vacuum of space is supposed to be the intelligent thinking of allegedly educated men and
women.
such is about as believable as my Thanksgiving turkey evolving from a dinosaur and then
back into my Thanksgiving turkey. yet, this is their folly.
here's a link which try's to answer the question " what was early earth like ? "
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
it try's to answer the question but fails miserably as with all Evolutionists trying to
make facts out of fiction. burning elements roasting in poison gas makes no life from
elements that are not alive to begin with. their contrary view to their own inventions of
' facts ' just go to show that they are brainwashed by their own devices which desperately
hope there is no God to answer to.
dream on, boys.
Three miles below the Pacific Ocean waters a bathescope descended and
located right next to hot lave flows transparent blind fish feeding on
plankton. They only existed within about two meters away from the lave
spouts due to the lower temperatures. These fish and plankton could stand
the immense pressures at these depths.

I suppose your god put them there and forgot to mention it in his old book
called the bible, or as any sane person will conclude, this is a microcosm
world existing at these depths where this particular life form developed.

Maybe we all descent form these early creatures, we may never know, but any
same person knows, no gods have ever done anything since they exist in the
minds of brain effected individuals - period.

You never see animals going through the absurd and often horrible fooleries
of magic and religion. Only man behaves with such gratuitous folly. It is
the price he has to pay for being intelligent but not, as yet, quite
intelligent enough.
[Aldous Leonard Huxley]
h***@wondering.com
2009-12-28 22:37:38 UTC
Permalink
My friend joe directs our attention to this page:

http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html

And in the very first paragraph we find:

"where and how did life begin? Many theories attempt to answer this
question, including the popular creationist theory, which states that
God created man in his own image, which may in fact be correct. However,
this section illustrates the scientific evidence that leads to an
evolutionary pathway. In the final analysis, both theories may turn out
to be the same."

Yep, our friend joe has found his stride on that page. He confirms that
as seen in God's revelation in the creation both can be correct.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...