Discussion:
Yet another thorn in the side of the Evolutionists : their re-definition of the word " organic "...
(too old to reply)
old man joe
2009-12-26 10:58:31 UTC
Permalink
one necessary aspect of Evolutionary thinking is the re-deifinition of words. it's just
another way of inventing " facts " as needed in their desperate search for explaining a
universe created by the guru's of Atheistic science.

for example, time is calculated by the rising and setting of the sun as far as hours and
days are concerned and earth's position as it revolves around the sun calculates seasons
and year's. not so in the world of Evolution. the bigger picture is figured from the
redefinition of time so that they can have a enough of it to propose 1: life came from the
elements of the Periodic Table that are not alive; 2: the burning ' early earth ' had
enough of it to cool down and the poison gases to dissipate so that life could develop
alive out of elements that are not only not alive but absolutely sterile.

their best shot at explaining a rational origin of the universe without God is by their
own admission, an " educated guess. " educated ? huh. the elements of the Periodic Table
are not alive. poison gases are not alive. time is not alive. lightning is not alive.
and the sterile " soup " of none living elements didn't come alive over time through their
magic wand of " educated guesses. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_time

one such word needing re-definition by the Evolutionists is the word " organic. "

anyone can look up the meaning of the word using the common source's available to everyone
in the industrialized world. but when we see how the Atheists use the word in hopes of
explaining Evolution to their own kind, the word now means something never alive is now
alive, or came from something which once was alive, or " organic. "

anyone can see this under the header " Miller - Urey Synthesis " in this link.

http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html

since an Atheist will swallow hook, line and sinker any explanation that his world came
from nothing alive, he'll doubtfully buy into what's being said on this Website.

the term ' organic ' carries with it the meaning of something alive or which was once
alive. so to make a living world in a test tube from stuff that is not alive and never
was alive it's very necessary to use a word which refer's to something alive thereby
duping oneself and other's.

to their credit however, they're well describing what their world will be like in the 5
months of Judgement Day... just as they've imagined what the earth was like when they say
it formed out of their Big Bang, this is how the Bible describes the world's end. sounds
just like Pv. 26:27...

" He who digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone,
it will come back on him. "
Free Lunch
2009-12-26 14:50:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by old man joe
one necessary aspect of Evolutionary thinking is the re-deifinition of words. it's just
another way of inventing " facts " as needed in their desperate search for explaining a
universe created by the guru's of Atheistic science.
for example, time is calculated by the rising and setting of the sun as far as hours and
days are concerned and earth's position as it revolves around the sun calculates seasons
and year's. not so in the world of Evolution. the bigger picture is figured from the
redefinition of time so that they can have a enough of it to propose 1: life came from the
elements of the Periodic Table that are not alive; 2: the burning ' early earth ' had
enough of it to cool down and the poison gases to dissipate so that life could develop
alive out of elements that are not only not alive but absolutely sterile.
their best shot at explaining a rational origin of the universe without God is by their
own admission, an " educated guess. " educated ? huh. the elements of the Periodic Table
are not alive. poison gases are not alive. time is not alive. lightning is not alive.
and the sterile " soup " of none living elements didn't come alive over time through their
magic wand of " educated guesses. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_time
one such word needing re-definition by the Evolutionists is the word " organic. "
anyone can look up the meaning of the word using the common source's available to everyone
in the industrialized world. but when we see how the Atheists use the word in hopes of
explaining Evolution to their own kind, the word now means something never alive is now
alive, or came from something which once was alive, or " organic. "
anyone can see this under the header " Miller - Urey Synthesis " in this link.
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
since an Atheist will swallow hook, line and sinker any explanation that his world came
from nothing alive, he'll doubtfully buy into what's being said on this Website.
the term ' organic ' carries with it the meaning of something alive or which was once
alive. so to make a living world in a test tube from stuff that is not alive and never
was alive it's very necessary to use a word which refer's to something alive thereby
duping oneself and other's.
to their credit however, they're well describing what their world will be like in the 5
months of Judgement Day... just as they've imagined what the earth was like when they say
it formed out of their Big Bang, this is how the Bible describes the world's end. sounds
just like Pv. 26:27...
" He who digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone,
it will come back on him. "
You really need to learn something and stop making things up that are
embarrassing to all informed people, whether they are Christian or not.

You also need to stop posting your falsehoods and delusions to so many
newsgroups. [Many cut]
Tom Jerry
2009-12-26 20:03:39 UTC
Permalink
bullshit
Had there been newsgroups a few hundred years ago, nuts like old man joe
would have elaborated on the necessity of burning "witches" and
perfecting the holy craft of inquisition.

Tom
h***@wondering.com
2009-12-28 22:28:35 UTC
Permalink
I do hope my friend joe had a blessed christmas. Now to his confusing
ideas.

"one necessary aspect of Evolutionary thinking is the re-deifinition of
words. it's just another way of inventing " facts " as needed in their
desperate search for expl aining a universe created by the guru's of
Atheistic science.

for example, time is calculated by the rising and setting of the sun as
far as hours and days are concerned and earth's position as it revolves
around the sun calculate s seasons and year's. not so in the world of
Evolution. the bigger picture is figured fr om the redefinition of time
so that they can have a enough of it to propose 1: life ca me from the
elements of the Periodic Table that are not alive; 2: the burning '
early ear th ' had enough of it to cool down and the poison gases to
dissipate so that life could develop alive out of elements that are not
only not alive but absolutely sterile."

Very confusing indeed. All people have the same idea and use of time.
For example, when the decay of elements is used to determine the age of
rocks it is expressed in years. There is no redefinition in the least.
The definition of years has not been changed and still in God's
revelation in the creation we see deep time periods using the exact same
units of time said to have been changed.

The idea of the basic elements being "alive" or not is irrelevant as to
any question of time.

So we are left with my friend saying much about nothing, all in his own
good time.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...