Discussion:
Yet another black eye for the Evolutionists : Time
(too old to reply)
unknown
2014-10-15 11:55:48 UTC
Permalink
these Evolutionists are beat up pretty bad as it is without another post countering their faulty
philosophy that life comes from elements that are not alive. that's the same as saying 2 dead
parents bring forth live children.

so, putting this philosophy of theirs to the test on the basis of the fact that there are no
elements that are alive... that no combination of elements are alive...
they also factor in ' time ' as thought much time brings to life that which is never alive to this
day.

in other words, these Evolutionists are saying that if we take elements that are not alive and
factor in ' time, ' which is not alive either, then these nonliving elements come to life. wow !

pretty neat trick !

overthrowing the philosophy of Evolution is easy.

Evolution can not stand without their inclusion of eon's of time. they have to factor in eon's of
time in order to sway the gullible into their philosophy that elements not alive plus eon's of time,
which is not either, makes elements not alive come to life.

they can not show how this happened except by cartoons featured on Science Channel and the like.

the logical question now becomes evident... why then do these Evolutionists assent to a
' science ' that obviously can not stand up to prudent investigation ?

obviously, then, Evolution is an attack against the Living God. it is an Anti-Christ religion.
it is promoted by Atheists, for Atheists. just as the elect of the Living God share His gospel with
an unbelieving world, so too do the Atheists share their gospel of a Godless, purposeless existence
with the world. other Atheists eat it up while Creationist's reject it.

if one can and apply Eph. 2:12 to the mix, one will find that the Bible word in that verse
rendered " without God " is rendered from the Greek word " atheos, " from which we get our word
" atheist. "

an Atheist then, is a person who is ' without God; ' a stranger, an alien to God, not belonging to
Him, an outcast, as that passage declares... one who's name is not written in His Book of Life and
therefore, is abandoned by God... hence the preaching of a Godless existence.

Adam was made by the Living God from the non-living elements of the earth. Adam came to life only
by the Living God putting His life into him. simple and sweet... the Living God is the Giver of
life. this also tells us that life is not of this world but of the Living God. we certainly find
no element on the Periodic Table called " the living element. "

but the Evolutionists will steer around answering this most basic question of " where does life
come from " ? we will get plenty of cursing and intimidation from them but such is only a show of
pretentious ignorance... after all, everybody knows there is The Living God simply because God takes
it upon Himself to enlighten everybody to the reality of His presence in the world just as we read
in Ro.1:18 and following.
raven1
2014-10-15 13:47:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
these Evolutionists are beat up pretty bad as it is without another post countering their faulty
philosophy that life comes from elements that are not alive.
How many times do you have to be told that

1) This is a composition fallacy, and
2) Evolution has nothing to do with how life began

before you process them, and stop making the same idiotic mistakes?
b***@m.nu
2014-10-15 18:28:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
these Evolutionists are beat up pretty bad as it is without another post countering their faulty
philosophy that life comes from elements that are not alive. that's the same as saying 2 dead
parents bring forth live children.
no what you are talking about is abiogenesis and that is an argument
for theists not atheists after all you are the one that believes in
adam and eve
Post by unknown
so, putting this philosophy of theirs to the test on the basis of the fact that there are no
elements that are alive... that no combination of elements are alive...
they also factor in ' time ' as thought much time brings to life that which is never alive to this
day.
again this is what abiogenesis is....
Post by unknown
in other words, these Evolutionists are saying that if we take elements that are not alive and
factor in ' time, ' which is not alive either, then these nonliving elements come to life. wow !
again abiogenesis..... and that is not what evolutionists say or think
Post by unknown
pretty neat trick !
overthrowing the philosophy of Evolution is easy.
funny you have not dont it.. nor has anyone else ever done it, why is
it abiogenesis not tought in school? why is adam and eve not tought in
school?
Post by unknown
Evolution can not stand without their inclusion of eon's of time. they have to factor in eon's of
time in order to sway the gullible into their philosophy that elements not alive plus eon's of time,
which is not either, makes elements not alive come to life.
they can not show how this happened except by cartoons featured on Science Channel and the like.
it is funny you say cartoons because your entire faiith is based on
some mythical and magical sorcerer

<snip snip>
b***@m.nu
2014-10-15 18:40:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
these Evolutionists are beat up pretty bad as it is without another post countering their faulty
philosophy that life comes from elements that are not alive. that's the same as saying 2 dead
parents bring forth live children.
that is about as far as I got because there is no reason at all to
read any more and it cries for an answer to a question that noone has
asked you so I will ask you this question now.....

were you born this stupid or did your mommy make you that way?

Loading...